I am pleased to announce that after some time both Blitzkrieg and Relentless Attack have been nerfed.

The nerf RA received is -1 range for militia and + 20 cost for bombers, while Blitz nerf includes -1 range and +10 cost to militia.
On the side note Master of Stealth has been buffed for some time now, so the new stats for infantry now include -1 for attack but +1 for defense.

On the side note as the season continues, the team has been working on some interesting new gameplay additions and will be added soon, so stay tuned!

~Eagle

  |

תגובות

תשיג מנוי כדי להסתיר את כל מודעות הפרסום
תגובות: 50   בוקר על ידי: 603 users
19.06.2020 - 09:28
Thanks
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:31
Why nerf RA into oblivion :/
----
BoraBaba
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:31
Should i use the miltia for defense with mos or inf now?
----
im bad, noob
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:34
 AIex
Why nerf blitz? It requires a lot of patience and skills
XAXAXA
----
I'm horny
Amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics
Istanbul?Thats not how you pronounce Constantinople
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:34
... now blitzkrieg is worst than before...
----
"What you see online, is never, the whole absolute truth, about anyone"
-Palmitas 2019
If you read this, i'm telling you are reading something wrote by a "fail troll" that doesn't want to troll.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:36
 Zoe
My elo
(beserok we are in this together bud)
----
Little star, your orbit continues. Radiating such brightness, a journey, so beautiful.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:37
Nerfs RA but doesn't reduce bombers 9att more than SM

----
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:50
AW in 2040:

Blitzkrieg is once again nerfed with -1 range and +20 costs to militia. We apologize for the inconveniences, we realised the boost was unbalenced, hopefully this will fix it! Cheers!
----





נכתב על ידי Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 09:54
Id say make bomber attack 8 on RA is better than +20 cost
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 10:16
I agree with both of the decisions but when we will see SM buff?
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 10:29
Karens and SJW win again.

Nerfing an already deeply flawed strat like blitz and once again blowing RA into oblivion.
Lets go back to playing PD forever.
Great job.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 10:29
----

טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 10:36
נכתב על ידי E i D, 19.06.2020 at 09:54

Id say make bomber attack 8 on RA is better than +20 cost

Ad Astra why did your name to fricking Salted Wound
[Edit] I also like Wound's idea is very good
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 10:50
How about you nerf Lucky bastard or is that too much to ask for because that brings you $$$$$ from the premium subscribers?

Or just continue nerfing the few good free strategies left.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:29
נכתב על ידי Waffel, 19.06.2020 at 09:50

AW in 2040:

Blitzkrieg is once again nerfed with -1 range and +20 costs to militia. We apologize for the inconveniences, we realised the boost was unbalenced, hopefully this will fix it! Cheers!

Now troops move in the opposite direction og where you sent them
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:39
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:40
RA being nerfed? I'm fucking dying of laughter

Pump that shit up boy!
----
• Fuck the Chinese Communist Party and Fuck The World Health Organisation •





טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:41
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:43
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:46
נכתב על ידי Streetcar, 19.06.2020 at 10:50

How about you nerf Lucky bastard or is that too much to ask for because that brings you $$$$$ from the premium subscribers?

Or just continue nerfing the few good free strategies left.

Blitz and RA were too autism and powerful so they needed a nerf, also LB ain't that op, you get troops with high crit for a high price.
----


טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 11:51
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:09
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:16
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:17
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:36
why dont u guys stop playing with the damn strats and just focus on new ones, it always just ends up geting nerfed back to how they were before or worse xD
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:45
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: Offtopic.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:52
Support Support Support, Great job nerd team
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:57
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: offtopic
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 12:59
Message deleted by clovis1122. Reason: offtopic
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 13:00
Ok RA nerf wont nearly affect scenarios, so it kinda has no real point excpet forcing players to remember militia nerf and bomber +20 in world map.
But blitz reinf basicly vaporizes all the use blitz has in competitive games; where you can use cheap secondary defence to capture cities when u are broke, or quickly assemble defensive stack, or wall easily. Rip WW1 Blitz Russia, RIP 10K Blitz World Maps, RIP militia spam in ancient to get quick stack.
So good job for not nearly nerfing RA back to its shittiness but also for limiting all uses of blitz only to Modern World RP Maps.
----
"Imagination rules the world!"
-Napoleon-
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 13:17
Thank you for the update. I do not like the idea of nerfing blitz however.
----
Always follow your heart cause it will lead you to anywhere in life
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 13:38
Blitz fags btfo
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 14:23
Good changes
----
If it's still in your mind, it's worth taking the risk.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 14:27
As someone who rarely uses Blitz, I find this beyond disheartening as yet another strategy has been nerfed towards oblivion. Blitzkrieg, as it was, was an interesting anomaly that had spiced up 3 vs. 3's and scenarios as a wild card strat. It yielded no additional offensive power like IF (juggernaut units) or LB (killer offense) and would have shattered under the pressures of a stacking game. Where it lacked in offensive power, it also lacked in defensive power as it suffered from -1 def to all units and -2 to infantry in cities. Infantry was rendered practically useless aside from throwing men to the front lines. Without troops and money, Blitz was useless.

While large scale use of militia was a core backbone in a pro player's repertoire, it provided for a double-edged sword as defending cities directly would be a huge mistake and one can only tb for so long. Walling cities and delaying retaliation would be difficult as high rank players judiciously wf cities. One would also have to take the opponents cities in the first place, which are also walled, to do significant damage to the enemy.

Infantry have their uses and the range does make the difference. While they are normally twice the cost, it is inconvenient to keep building transports on a limited budget and the 10 range versus the 6 range of militia was well worth it in making long range attacks. We are also forgetting that it takes masses of militia and harrowing casualties to take opponents cities whether they are well-defended or not. Not to mention the fact that one has limited reinforcements and wasting reinforcements on militia who do not enjoy the full benefits of Blitzkrieg or the same amount of attack as superior units is inefficient and counterproductive. Nerfing them is a huge handicap as Blitz players can no longer enjoy the same inadequate buffer in troop count that supplemented their strained incomes.

Targeting strategies because they aren't supposed to win against "more cultured strategies" is not the way to go. Maybe we should be focusing on the creation of more strategies to live up the game play instead?
----
hi
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 15:48
Militia should have -10 cost with blitz, but keep the range nerf. Relentless Attack should be buffed from what it was, not nerfed. The bombers should have extra range and the infantry should have extra attack because it is "relentless" attack, which means the user will attack relentlessly with all units at his disposal
----
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 15:53
Why'd you nerf blitz range, i main blitz and this is very mad!!!
----
yeetus deletus throw that fetus
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 16:22
נכתב על ידי pakistani tiger, 19.06.2020 at 10:16

I agree with both of the decisions but when we will see SM buff?

Isn't SM fine as is?
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 16:29
נכתב על ידי Luo Tianyi, 19.06.2020 at 14:27

As someone who rarely uses Blitz, I find this beyond disheartening as yet another strategy has been nerfed towards oblivion. Blitzkrieg, as it was, was an interesting anomaly that had spiced up 3 vs. 3's and scenarios as a wild card strat. It yielded no additional offensive power like IF (juggernaut units) or LB (killer offense) and would have shattered under the pressures of a stacking game. Where it lacked in offensive power, it also lacked in defensive power as it suffered from -1 def to all units and -2 to infantry in cities. Infantry was rendered practically useless aside from throwing men to the front lines. Without troops and money, Blitz was useless.

While large scale use of militia was a core backbone in a pro player's repertoire, it provided for a double-edged sword as defending cities directly would be a huge mistake and one can only tb for so long. Walling cities and delaying retaliation would be difficult as high rank players judiciously wf cities. One would also have to take the opponents cities in the first place, which are also walled, to do significant damage to the enemy.

Infantry have their uses and the range does make the difference. While they are normally twice the cost, it is inconvenient to keep building transports on a limited budget and the 10 range versus the 6 range of militia was well worth it in making long range attacks. We are also forgetting that it takes masses of militia and harrowing casualties to take opponents cities whether they are well-defended or not. Not to mention the fact that one has limited reinforcements and wasting reinforcements on militia who do not enjoy the full benefits of Blitzkrieg or the same amount of attack as superior units is inefficient and counterproductive. Nerfing them is a huge handicap as Blitz players can no longer enjoy the same inadequate buffer in troop count that supplemented their strained incomes.

Targeting strategies because they aren't supposed to win against "more cultured strategies" is not the way to go. Maybe we should be focusing on the creation of more strategies to live up the game play instead?

That's not exactly accurate. Blitz became more than just a wild card. It became a meta strat, used regularly in both CWs and duels. If you've payed attention to the competitive scene recently, you'd agree with me on this. Even in the recent Master of East tournament, Blitz saw a very high increase in popularity and use. The game play for blitz before the nerf was considered unhealthy and unbalanced for the game. Hell, it doesn't even resemble historically what "Blitzkrieg" was.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 16:32
נכתב על ידי JUGERS2, 19.06.2020 at 09:37

Nerfs RA but doesn't reduce bombers 9att more than SM



If you nerf the bombers to 8 attack, they become unusable, since the tanks already have 8 attack, are way cheaper, and have very good range.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 16:33
נכתב על ידי Khauman, 19.06.2020 at 09:31

Should i use the miltia for defense with mos or inf now?

I would suggest the infantry, since they now have 7 defense.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 18:05
נכתב על ידי Lelouch., 19.06.2020 at 16:32

נכתב על ידי JUGERS2, 19.06.2020 at 09:37

Nerfs RA but doesn't reduce bombers 9att more than SM



If you nerf the bombers to 8 attack, they become unusable, since the tanks already have 8 attack, are way cheaper, and have very good range.

Do they fly? The got more than double the range but not double the cost if you undo the cost nerf.
----
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 18:29
נכתב על ידי JUGERS2, 19.06.2020 at 09:37

Nerfs RA but doesn't reduce bombers 9att more than SM



You do realize that SM is more than just 8 attack bombers. It has reduced cost and increased range. Also Air Transports have +1 extra capacity and cheap cost of 350. Dont forget to mention that AT's have been given +1 attack and +1 defense as well as Stealth bombers with +2 attack and 70 reduced cost. Also Sky Menace is a utility strategy not a purely offensive only strategy like RA or DS is. You rely on cheaper air transports to move units around very quickly. We must stray away from this rush with only 1 unit type meta. It makes for a silly unbalanced game.
----
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 19:05
נכתב על ידי JUGERS2, 19.06.2020 at 18:05

נכתב על ידי Lelouch., 19.06.2020 at 16:32

נכתב על ידי JUGERS2, 19.06.2020 at 09:37

Nerfs RA but doesn't reduce bombers 9att more than SM



If you nerf the bombers to 8 attack, they become unusable, since the tanks already have 8 attack, are way cheaper, and have very good range.

Do they fly? The got more than double the range but not double the cost if you undo the cost nerf.

Now they are practically MoS Stealths without the stealth. No one can complain about that.
טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 21:17
נכתב על ידי lsilorien, 19.06.2020 at 10:29

Nerfing an already deeply flawed strat like blitz


Indeed, the defense debuff makes Blitzkrieg a strategy that only works out if you're on the attack. The -1 defense really does make a big difference because if you lose the initiative with Blitz you are likely going to lose, and now with this militia cost increase and the -1 range, it really, REALLY kills the potential for Blitz in games like 3v3s and 10K worlds, because your militia hordes are what holds up your campaign at the start of the game. I almost always use Blitzkrieg since I prefer to move quickly, and now I pay the price for building my playstyle around a single strat. I never though Blitz would be debuffed, especially not in this manner.

So yeah, I just got screwed over.
----
Blitzkrieg enthusiast. That's all you need to know.

טוען...
טוען...
19.06.2020 - 23:11
This makes me somewhat relieved I started transitioning out of Blitz and into other strategies like GW. The -1 Defense was a huge handicap already to begin with. But I will always remember Blitz as the strategy that won me the most games and allowed me to experiment on different tactics which made each game unique due to its range.
טוען...
טוען...
20.06.2020 - 00:10
I understand why blitzkrieg militia would get a range nerf. but why nerf the cost? that is just a bit too drastic

But yeah, I think it was a good idea to boost MoS, whoever suggested that you got my eternal gratitude. This is the right way to balance the game, by boosting.
טוען...
טוען...
20.06.2020 - 07:56
נכתב על ידי Lelouch., 19.06.2020 at 16:33

נכתב על ידי Khauman, 19.06.2020 at 09:31

Should i use the miltia for defense with mos or inf now?

I would suggest the infantry, since they now have 7 defense.

k
----
im bad, noob
טוען...
טוען...
02.07.2020 - 06:24
Time after time , you guys resemble the true example of how spoiled and disappointing an administration can be
meh
טוען...
טוען...
07.07.2020 - 14:00
Back to atwar after 3 years and i see nerfs for RA and BLITZ. What happend to u game? rip.
טוען...
טוען...
11.07.2020 - 02:52
 time
נכתב על ידי Waffel, 19.06.2020 at 09:50

AW in 2040:

Blitzkrieg is once again nerfed with -1 range and +20 costs to militia. We apologize for the inconveniences, we realised the boost was unbalenced, hopefully this will fix it! Cheers!


On the side note we are working on exciting new features that'll blow your mind so stay tuned, 2040 gonna be AW's year.
----
I wf'd UK
טוען...
טוען...



Hits total: 1877 | This month: 583