Dave
|
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Oh nooo, will that mean the -10 cost upgrade won't work for infantry?
---- https://prnt.sc/W3aEpwbpEwEU
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
whitout that up, lb inf cost is 80
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Wow - I did not see the DS nerf coming - I know there were discussions about a variety of factors, but capacity? Wow. Now, you need the upgrade for Helos to transport Marines at all, under any circumstances! Anyway, whatever works! We shall find out soon enough 
---- Embrace the void 
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Dave the ds nerf does almost nothing. Very rarely do you ever use more than 1 marine in your helicopter stack and even rarer is when you need to carry 2 marines.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
God damnit Dave, it was fiiiiine, all y'all just noobs
---- *War in Europe again isn't good for anyone... that's why the EU Needs to Evoke and Become the EEC once more, as an International, Nationalist Union Long Live The Realms! Long Live the Europeans!*
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Add new strategies dont change the old ones 
----    >playing atwar:  Furthermore, I consider that NWE must be destroyed
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
Here, have one of these. You'll be fine in the morning. 
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Inf which costs $ 10 more is not bad idea, but a milit that costs + $ 1 in maintenance is madness. It seems that $ 1 is not so much, but when you have a lot of cities, this cost is incredibly high, sometimes you have to collect militia from cities to somehow destroy it and get rid of the cost of living. General can redress the cost of infantry in the main group, but nobody is holding the militia in the main stack. As for Ds, it has become useless for people who do not have "ds improvement", i.e. most players below r7, I still dont have this improvement and I am r9. 29k sp is too much for improving the strategy that you only use to play in 5k games, because let's face it, it's not very useful. Now this strategy has become dead for me because helicopters cant take cities, and air transport is far too expensive. PS. Do something about HW, it's useless
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
And what now, everyone have to play pd? Sm is nerfed, cuz def is like blits. Lb nerfed, ds nerfed, gw def nerfed... Gc is sad story, blits totaly destroyed by lao, ra same... Pd and imper only left to be played and thats boring. Why to have 7+ strats which can be interesting to play, when we all can spam imper infs...
----  http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14714&topicsearch=&page= 
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Ok now time to do something about RA. 75% of players considere RA useless while i thiink only usefull if you can fullspam Main Attack units.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
-1 range to infs for LB wouldve been far less destructive to the strat... like this its only use is basically in 25k and 50k games. ds is fine with this nerf i guess its offensive edge is curbed a little bit more.
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon 
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
Kaska החשבון נמחק |
|||
|
Fristly thanks for the changes. I welcome any updates even if i don't necessarily agree with them. However. The lb nerf completely kills the strat and leaves it with no competitive niche. The infantry AND militia costs were removed in a previous update for a reason. RA also used to have 40 cost militia. People dont realise the significance of a 33% cost increase to the most cost efficient unit in the game that is acquired through expansion. I suppose it will be good to see lb spam killed off for a while. Also as witch doctor said the ds nerf achieves almost nothing.
---- 
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
mmmmmwwwwahahahahahaha! *twirls mustache* 
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
Nah, Inf cost is 70 -10 (upgrade) + 10 (lucky bastard)
You can also play IF and NC
----  
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
N.
Rip lb if that hap.
---- http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14714&topicsearch=&page=
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
I like this approach of testing changes out, but i got to say i disagree with the changes. As much as everyone hates the absurd rolls and expansion contesting power of LB the last thing we need is another viable strategy dead. Also a defensive nerf for DS as ive read everyone suggest in other threads is a better approach, but thanks for trying to shake things up.
---- Ik ben een STD fabriek.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
That suck now on scenario i can't anymore play lb, why u doing that change with only taking care about classic world map or classic 3v3 … majority of commu Don't play 3v3, eu, or cw take care about that ! not about the few players playing only 3v3 and cw
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
First of all let us all rejoiced. LB killed Atwar and replaced it with mechanism by the day. If you consider to bring it back one day keep in mind good way to do it is just setting sea transfort capability to zero so it will not have to do two things at once for free and the player will have to choose between long range and short range combat if he does'nt want to spend so much money. At least now we have active staff so that even if buffing stage does'nt go well they can make conclusions. But I truely believe everything was better than LB mechanism.
----  
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
sooo. by your logic, +10 cost for all units is worse then -1 range for its infantry?
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
njab החשבון נמחק |
njab החשבון נמחק
How come Dave joined 4nic's clan and took it over? Also I think the award for biggest noob on AtWar goes to... khm khm khm tada tada tadu (look who lost the duel!)  Congratulations Sultan!
טוען...
טוען...
|
||
As usual the majority of the community has their voice unheard. LB now generally unplayable in most scenarios thanks to this update. Why continually nerf strats until we are left with a bland set of strategies to pick from that no one likes.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
Kaska החשבון נמחק |
Kaska החשבון נמחק
Bro, 4nic clan has and will always be the propriety of Fcd3. Nothing new with him being leader. But seriously this guy is TAKING EVERYTHING OVER, SOMEONE TO STOP HIM (if boywind, may he rip, was still here he would be dabing ATM) Agree this nerf on ds isn't appropriate since u most of the time only carry 1 marines to take the city. The LB nerf is appropriate, don't listen at those cry babies amongst the rp players.
טוען...
טוען...
|
||
Kaska החשבון נמחק |
|||
I'll be honest, Sultan raped me. But he was so nice he surrendered rather than claim his (well earned) victory. And yes I've temporarily assumed control of the clan, until I can figure out who the rightful owners are/should be. Please don't derail the thread though. If you want to discuss either issue further, start a new thread. 
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
---- ''People ask for criticism, but they only want praise.''
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
Im the clans owner though
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
Let's talk PM
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
njab החשבון נמחק |
|||
1.- whitout lb the only strats left for competitive are pd and imp. If gc gw sm nc and blitz are low use and are only usefull for ukrania or to do specific moves(like nc uk) you will never compare the times people play pd or imp whit the other strats. 2.- rp no longer exist in atwar, it is rarely played now, you just cant name any other map except boring default europe "rp". This hurt hard the scenario community(i am part of it) and i can say lb is not over used(imp is) but is a very good option to try if you boring of imp or want to do specific moves, now it is useless for almost everything, other maps like ancient world or default world use lb a lot too, but at least they have many good strats to pick, other ramdom maps that are up sometimes (like shogunate, rome politicial, colonial age, world in xxxx) use lb too. 3.- And this is to the lb nerf, i am disagreed whit the +10 for militia, the upkeep will be very high for this and the mil is not used at all majority of games, it is already annoying to have militia in many places doing nathing but costing you money, i doubt somebody will spam lb militia as a meta so this just ruin strat to much in my opinion. 4.- Now that lb is ruined, you can bring back some strats to a usefull way, strats like hw (totally useless and never played except for trolling) ra and blitz(mainly used for noobs/low ranks/new players and blitz for very specific moves but still useless) mos (this is a good strat but low used, i think because it is an expensive strat so people dont find it good for competitive or low starting funds maps, maybe a small buff can introduce this strat:D)
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
huh
---- ''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies'' ~Napoleon
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
RP still exists in fact it's plays are ever increasing
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
All changes to the player's weight?.. there are a lot of things you can change that you probably know and indifferently like how to create the game with random players who will want to play at that time rather than a "set up" game... and many more as one that makes the game over and over again unjust such as taking each player's points that match him that has won with his value and not losing them if he missed the fight or betrayed as is often the case and we have end up being afraid of how many traitors we play and stuffed with lists to know who we can and who we are not to play .... (many people are gone for these reasons ..)
טוען...
טוען...
|
|||
|
Y nic with -1 lb inf range, that strat would be so boring to use. With this +10 cost fau. lb is in big problems too. Now premium strats wont be that big advantage...
---- http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=14714&topicsearch=&page=
טוען...
טוען...
|
