13.07.2013 - 18:31
I am simply curious as to why they are named marines. They are stealth units that can deploy from subs and do sneak attacks. Marines are for naval landings. Wouldn't it be more logical to name them "special forces" or "rangers" or something? This may have been suggested before but I am wondering why it is marines, it doesn't exactly seem very fitting for what they are useed for in AW. I would imagine technically they would simply be a branch of infantry instead of stealth units like we use them.
---- I hate to advocate drugs alcohol and violence to the kids, but it's always worked for me.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
13.07.2013 - 22:24
You answered your own question.
---- Our Mahdi will have a broad forehead and a prominent nose. He will fill the earth with justice as it is filled with injustice and tyranny.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
13.07.2013 - 22:26
No marines are amphibious infantry. For (what ever kind of stealth misson) deploying from subs sound more like navy seals. BUT they are mostly used on land and with GW like partisans. Again just wondering why did we go with marines and not something simplely generic like "special forces".
---- I hate to advocate drugs alcohol and violence to the kids, but it's always worked for me.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
13.07.2013 - 23:16
You can put marines in normal transports. Nothing stops you.
---- Our Mahdi will have a broad forehead and a prominent nose. He will fill the earth with justice as it is filled with injustice and tyranny.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
14.07.2013 - 00:18
You're still completely missing the purpose of the question and not attempting to provide a good answer.
---- I hate to advocate drugs alcohol and violence to the kids, but it's always worked for me.
טוען...
טוען...
|
אתה בטוח