Preset alliances for scenarios!

תשיג מנוי כדי להסתיר את כל מודעות הפרסום

הודעות: 44 בוקר על ידי: 102 users

פוסט מקורי

פורסם על ידי Utah, 10.05.2013 - 07:30

Sorry if this has been asked before but I searched and found nothing. So in my colonial scenario all the major powers always ally and it's really annoying. So can we have preset alliances that can't be broken until I allow it in events or something. So maybe I'll make 13 colonies an ally of Great Britain until turn x then they can end their alliance if they want.

Pyrrhus Optimates הודעות: 324 מ: דנמרק	27.07.2014 - 01:18 Pyrrhus More support! Advanced atWar diplomacy pls! ---- "Another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone" - Pyrrhus of Epirus טוען... טוען...
Pheonixking929 Optimates הודעות: 1979	27.07.2014 - 08:41 Pheonixking929 YES! a BIG YES FROM ME ---- Everyone is living a myth and it's important to know what yours is. It could be a tragedy- and maybe you don't want it to be. טוען... טוען...
Fockmeeard Stalins Martians הודעות: 718 מ: USA	27.07.2014 - 12:18 Fockmeeard Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now. טוען... טוען...
Meester Veni Vidi Vici הודעות: 3256	27.07.2014 - 21:41 Meester נכתב על ידי Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18 Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now. True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn. טוען... טוען...
OKELEUK הודעות: 529 מ: הולנד	02.08.2014 - 01:11 OKELEUK נכתב על ידי Pyrrhus, 27.07.2014 at 01:18 Advanced atWar diplomacy pls! Yes please, somethimes its really confusing as some teams in history fought eachother but then Fought with Eachother and bla and Teamswitch and all that jazz. Total Support ---- טוען... טוען...
Shadownano Union הודעות: 2 מ: ונצואלה	03.08.2014 - 03:03 Shadownano Absolute Support. ---- Alejandro (/Shadownano/Romano/) Madrid טוען... טוען...
Sinjid Cartography Society הודעות: 384 מ: Korea, North	04.08.2014 - 16:26 Sinjid This has been suggested many many times before, even I had a post on it. Support! טוען... טוען...
EpicRice הודעות: 69 מ: Jersey	04.08.2014 - 22:26 EpicRice Could we also not have everyone start out at war in scenario/non scenario? Unless it's something like Nazi Germany and Russia, I don't think Canada and Great Britain should be at war~ ---- Capitalism, Ho! טוען... טוען...
Professor Adog The Imperial Academy הודעות: 1830 מ: UK	05.08.2014 - 05:27 Professor Adog :Thumbup: YAAAAAY ---- טוען... טוען...
Sinjid Cartography Society הודעות: 384 מ: Korea, North	05.08.2014 - 21:02 Sinjid נכתב על ידי Meester, 27.07.2014 at 21:41 נכתב על ידי Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18 Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now. True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn. That introduces another problem: what if the players declare war or someone sets up a game that turns out to be boring for the first 10 turns (about an hour) but becomes pivotal later? If we had role-players in a game, we could do that. טוען... טוען...
Meester Veni Vidi Vici הודעות: 3256	06.08.2014 - 01:44 Meester נכתב על ידי Sinjid, 05.08.2014 at 21:02 נכתב על ידי Meester, 27.07.2014 at 21:41 נכתב על ידי Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18 Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now. True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn. That introduces another problem: what if the players declare war or someone sets up a game that turns out to be boring for the first 10 turns (about an hour) but becomes pivotal later? If we had role-players in a game, we could do that. Well you can set the truce to be breakable after a certain turn. טוען... טוען...
Sinjid Cartography Society הודעות: 384 מ: Korea, North	06.08.2014 - 20:20 Sinjid נכתב על ידי Meester, 06.08.2014 at 01:44 נכתב על ידי Sinjid, 05.08.2014 at 21:02 נכתב על ידי Meester, 27.07.2014 at 21:41 נכתב על ידי Fockmeeard, 27.07.2014 at 12:18 Why can't you just make it a team game and have everybody who is suppose to be allies with each be on the same team? I get that you can't break the alliance afterwards but then again breaking alliances might not be a good idea since the host can rage and ban you now. True but this opens up a-lot of possibilities like having Russia and Japan remain at peace in a WW2 game till a certain turn. That introduces another problem: what if the players declare war or someone sets up a game that turns out to be boring for the first 10 turns (about an hour) but becomes pivotal later? If we had role-players in a game, we could do that. Well you can set the truce to be breakable after a certain turn. Exactly what I mean. Players could have a very important scenario side but not be able to do anything right away for the first 10 turns, 40-50+ minutes. טוען... טוען...
Rin Tohsaka הודעות: 37 מ: USA	07.08.2014 - 03:51 Rin Tohsaka This is something that NEEDS to happen. 100% support. ---- "All he does is smoke pot, jerk off and play that damn game" ~Michael Townley. טוען... טוען...
Yazzy הודעות: 210 מ: UK	09.08.2014 - 02:54 Yazzy Yayaya ok ---- #FuckHdrakon טוען... טוען...

חפש:
על ידי משתמש:
בפורום:
	בכותרות נושאים בהודעות