Diversity

There are tons of people who play 3v3's on the Europe+ map. Literally 90% of all cw's are on this feature. I think, (and this is just an opinion) that it's being played a little too much, even if it is a good map.
Sure, there are tons of rp's. I'm not saying that's better. Sure, you have to know how to wall and such in 3v3, unlike in rp where you troop spam. But that's not the point. Rp's are designed to be too laggy to wall (:P) , and revolves around the requirements that people chat and there is world peace.
Anyways, people are considered pros by mastering Eu+ 3v3.
Why not have 3v2 Oceania cw's? World 5/3k? Why not ancient? This is a strategy game. Should it still be strategic if what's considered a good player, one that can wall and move his/her units sure, but also one who memorizes how to play as France, Germany, Italy, UK, Turkey, Ukraine, Poland, etc? I think what makes a good player is their ability to be flexible, able to adapt. Knowing every single Eu+ 3v3 expansion isn't going to help in Ancient, is it?
I do realize that there are some people who love 3v3's. I have nothing against 3v3's, I just think they shouldn't be the center point of this game. I challenge people to take a month without playing on Europe+.

What do you guys think? Do you love 3v3's as much as rp'ers love rp? And is there something missing that I don't understand about 3v3's? Are you willing to try 3v1 europe+ instead? hehehehe

Leave your thoughts below, please.

EDIT: I'm not pointing fingers at 3v3'ers. This can be for everybody. Don't think others are terrible until you've tried them, and besides, just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's bad.