|
I can only have 9 options in the poll so here you are. 9 of the least spoken or used strategies these days! Vote on what you think the weakest is.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
RA,too bad attack espsecially without the luckier tank upgrade plus expensive.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
HW is one the worst strategies ever but still little bit better than RA , so my vote goes for RA
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
RA, HW, Blitz should definitively win this
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Hw and ra should win this. But theyre not that much weaker than the others. The strats are in the overall best shape theyve ever been in. Ra and hw are just short of being competitive. But on the flipside, ra would probably win a most popular pole.
Hw should be deleted as ive said before. I pushed for it to be boosted since some ppl enjoy it and it is just short of being good right now. But to make it competitive youd need to boost the inf or tanks(usurping gc) or the marines/militia(usurping gw). It would need to be reinvented entirely since it brings nothing new to the table. It has no niche or perhaps 1 so obscure that i have not found it yet.
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Funny how RA got more votes than HW, even tho RA is still more played than HW.
Hw and ra should win this. But theyre not that much weaker than the others. The strats are in the overall best shape theyve ever been in. Ra and hw are just short of being competitive. But on the flipside, ra would probably win a most popular pole.
Hw should be deleted as ive said before. I pushed for it to be boosted since some ppl enjoy it and it is just short of being good right now. But to make it competitive youd need to boost the inf or tanks(usurping gc) or the marines/militia(usurping gw). It would need to be reinvented entirely since it brings nothing new to the table. It has no niche or perhaps 1 so obscure that i have not found it yet.
Maybe remove HW and add http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=20437 ?
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
RA, HW, Blitz should definitively win this
Called for.
Blitz is laughable atm, can't believe I actually won the following 2 battles
Helis with 8 attack against infantries with 2 defense is pure BS. Even Blitz tanks would have defended better.
טוען...
טוען...
|
Nero הודעות: 3756 מ: USA
|
Blitzkrieg. Lao noob. A little extra range for a huge defense drop. At least increase the attack, too.
----
Laochra¹: i pray to the great zizou, that my tb stops the airtrans of the yellow infidel
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
נכתב על ידי Nero, 26.06.2016 at 21:15
Blitzkrieg. Lao noob. A little extra range for a huge defense drop. At least increase the attack, too.
Finally someone who speaks truth
The Church of Nero and The Church of Lord Zizou should merge!
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Helis with 8 attack against infantries with 2 defense is pure BS. Even Blitz tanks would have defended better.
boosting blitz because it cant defend against ds helis is as stupid as boosting sm because it sucks on mideast 3k. Congrats you've outdone yourself this time. Guess what +1 defence to the blitz inf and it still will suck at defending against helis.
1700 elo ladies and gentlemen.
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Helis with 8 attack against infantries with 2 defense is pure BS. Even Blitz tanks would have defended better.
boosting blitz because it cant defend against ds helis is as stupid as boosting sm because it sucks on mideast 3k. Congrats you've outdone yourself this time. Guess what +1 defence to the blitz inf and it still will suck at defending against helis.
1700 elo ladies and gentlemen.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Sorry dear what was the point of your post that i apparently missed?
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Sorry dear what was the point of your post that i apparently missed?
you're a fucking high rank!
;^) therefore you are a evil rankist
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
I say imperialist is the WEAKEST
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Have you guys even ever played HW? It is not even that ''weak''..
Mfw..
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
נכתב על ידי Waffel, 21.07.2016 at 02:49
Have you guys even ever played HW? It is not even that ''weak''..
Mfw..
id put it as a slighty weaker form of GC and GW mixed with eachother and mutated
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
IMO blitz is the weakest even though I originally voted for MOS.
Personally, I think it would be better if Blitz was +3 range +1 HP and -1 attack, maybe even +10 cost also. It really needs a major update.
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Holy god, LB 4th weakest strategy....
Its officially the most underrated strategy ever.
נכתב על ידי Desu, 26.09.2013 at 12:08
Do NOT use at ANY time:
Lucky Bastard - LB - Just... just don't use this. That is all.
Probably due to old comments like this one. Should update the guide desu ;_;
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Results line up well
Weakest is Relentless Attack, Hybrid Warfare, Blitz, Lucky Bastard, and None
As for discussion, I do believe LB is very underrated and the extra range you have on inf without the +10 cost hike is appreciable. IMO RA > Blitz, the def on blitz is absolutely horrid and RA has that additional range on tanks to make things comparable. Although the +3 range makes any comparison between the two difficult
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Results line up well
Weakest is Relentless Attack, Hybrid Warfare, Blitz, Lucky Bastard, and None
Wow, nice stats
I guess theses results can be taken from a general perspective. I still wonder what influenced on those players to underrate LB so much (doesn't have the strategy, was told that it sucks or read it somewhere, or actual gameplay perspective)
It would'be interesting to see some sort of polls available only to certain skilled players.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Results line up well
Weakest is Relentless Attack, Hybrid Warfare, Blitz, Lucky Bastard, and None
Wow, nice stats
I guess theses results can be taken from a general perspective. I still wonder what influenced on those players to underrate LB so much (doesn't have the strategy, was told that it sucks or read it somewhere, or actual gameplay perspective)
It would'be interesting to see some sort of polls available only to certain skilled players.
I think I have what you are looking for:
This graph is filtered by players who are r9+ (36 Responses)
This graph is filtered by players who enjoy 3v3s / Clan Wars (29 Responses)
Finally, your desired graph is a combination of both of the filters above (22 Responses)
A similarity between the three is that Hybrid Warfare, Blitz, and Relentless Attack seem to consistently appear as the "worst" strategies with the applied filters; however, your Lucky Bastard "under-rated-ness" diminishes drastically. Instead, what we see is that Relentless Attack is not considered the "worst", implying that it is better than Hybrid Warfare and/or Blitz.
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Blitz krieg is the best strat.
----
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Surprised no one talked about MoS but then again who wants to use dirty stealth?
טוען...
טוען...
|
Commando Zero החשבון נמחק |
Surprised no one talked about MoS but then again who wants to use dirty stealth?
MoS is the best strategy in world war
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
The strongest strats are:
25k, 50k, Lucky Bastard is strongest unit strategy hands down on small maps like Europe+
World maps, 25k and 50k, blitz is the strongest unless it's crowded.
15k, it depends on map and country, but if you have rich zone, LB is still strong
15k and below, in a poor zone, PD, IMP, and GW are strongest
5k and 10k, in a rich or poor zone with a small map and with lots of players, PD is strongest
3k is GW and IMP hands down
5k is GW, IMP, and PD
You may notice some strats weren't mentioned at all, those are the weak ones. They may have strong units, but they are too expensive, no range, etc which makes them inferior. The most inferior strategy of all on a big map with low player count is Iron Fist, and the most inferior strategy of all on a small crowded map is HW
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Ds are is the best strat {#sellyourgameivan}
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
Ds are is the best strat {#sellyourgameivan}
טוען...
טוען...
|
|
טוען...
טוען...
|