Remove 2x SP from Clan War.

Just in 25 mins. mauzer earn 2.5k SP on CW.




Other testimony:



You know? this ain't helping for "a prioritization of clan wars" as most people say and defend, but rather, to farm low rank clan, to make a new clan and play with unfair ranks just for the 2x, and of course, to farm SP.

---

New: 2x SP effect on Clan Wars:

•) The appear of "farming clans" (Clans playing for SP. They dont care about losing).

•) Greatly reduce the quality of CW's. If in the past we had few CW's but with quality, now we have a lot of cw's but without quality.

•) Probably the most negative effect: It greatly damage the current 3vs3 system. Players tend to CW more often, and 3vs3 less. This of course damage the player on long-term (no practice) and also affect the new players that still play 3vs3 on main lobby (no expert hand for play)

•) Bribe players. They want SP, they play for SP.

•) The cw's on custom maps (like ancient) are starting to grow. This would be good , except for the players doing it for SP, and not for the diversity.

---

EDIT: well I knew players who play cw's wouldn't support... I just want to say: Nice farm.

" If RP players play RP for fun and not for SP, then they wouldn't have problem if we Nerf it, would they?"

Cool, now let me add:

"If you guys play CW for fun and not for SP, then there wouldn't be a problem if it gets Nerf, would it?

Nice CW motivation destroy
Nice noob suggest

N

נכתב על ידי Mauzer Panteri, 30.11.2014 at 17:18

N

O

נכתב על ידי Covid19, 30.11.2014 at 17:19

נכתב על ידי Mauzer Panteri, 30.11.2014 at 17:18

N

O

P

נכתב על ידי Your Monkey, 30.11.2014 at 17:20

נכתב על ידי Covid19, 30.11.2014 at 17:19

נכתב על ידי Mauzer Panteri, 30.11.2014 at 17:18

N

O

P

E

נכתב על ידי clovis1122, 30.11.2014 at 17:09

inb4 farmers not supporting in 3.... 2.... 1...

Nice try
Try another suggestion and you will have more attiention

נכתב על ידי Your Mother, 30.11.2014 at 14:48

Agreed clovs, I suggest we remove all upgrades and sp from atwar. and lets see some real skilled games without cheater generals bonuses and upgrades. take these things out and no more "farming" problems :^D I think players should be separated by there skilles and knowledge of the game not ranks sp and purchased upgrades

נכתב על ידי Eph, 30.11.2014 at 17:41

Agreed clovs, I suggest we remove all upgrades and sp from atwar. and lets see some real skilled games without cheater generals bonuses and upgrades. take these things out and no more "farming" problems :^D I think players should be separated by there skilles and knowledge of the game not ranks sp and purchased upgrades

Or give everyone a gen. and have selectable upgrades for pesonalised strats.

Anyways to original idea

Clovis has a bee in his bonnet about the whole sp multipliers introduction. Competitve gameplay is the backbone of every game, every step possible should be made to encourage and promote it not discourage it.

bad suggestion

נכתב על ידי Eph, 30.11.2014 at 17:41

Agreed clovs, I suggest we remove all upgrades and sp from atwar. and lets see some real skilled games without cheater generals bonuses and upgrades. take these things out and no more "farming" problems :^D I think players should be separated by there skilles and knowledge of the game not ranks sp and purchased upgrades

it's called no strats and upgrades, and my god is it boring.

נכתב על ידי Nero, 30.11.2014 at 18:00

Support

נכתב על ידי Covid19, 30.11.2014 at 17:20

נכתב על ידי Your Monkey, 30.11.2014 at 17:20

נכתב על ידי Covid19, 30.11.2014 at 17:19

נכתב על ידי Mauzer Panteri, 30.11.2014 at 17:18

N

O

P

E

Hmmm I don't agree with getting rid of the 2x sp, but maybe lowering it is better idk I lile sp

1.5 atleast.

MAKE IT 3X!!

Support.
There should not really be a way to earn SP that's easier than other ways.
There should be enough of an SP bonus to justify the effort it takes to set up a clan war, but +100% is a bit too much.

I am entirely against any changes of how sp is made in games. All games should earn the same amount which is: 100%. Every map should be treated equally as long as they do not break any of the rules with sp farming. Rp is just a game, it's here and is popular enough to be played plenty of times each day. I know the reasons why they have done this but, my reason still stands. It is just another game and should be treated fairly. Let's change this bull shit with the sp it's just another thing that we gotta argue about on here lol

Bla dont agree cuse i like op sp farm to cws but i agree with it...nerf cws...or boost all games x2 even RP...thats the right way...btw nice dialogs.

נכתב על ידי Covid19, 30.11.2014 at 17:13

Nice CW motivation destroy
Nice noob suggest

Well, if Clan War needs SP for motivation, then it shouldn't exist in the first place, shouldn't it? Given how you're implying that it's less attractive than other games without the SP boost.

Also, to all the numerous people who have replied "no" or with a simple thumbs down, I ask, why not? Why does this +100% boost exist in the first place?

What do you mean "just in 25 minutes" ...its 25 turns.

But i agree, make it 150%.

Does who ask for 300% are fuckin crazy.

נכתב על ידי Goblin, 01.12.2014 at 06:49

What do you mean "just in 25 minutes" ...its 25 turns.

But i agree, make it 150%.

Does who ask for 300% are fuckin crazy.

All of you, stop being hypocrites. I fully concur with Goblin. +50% bonus is plenty.

נכתב על ידי clovis1122, 30.11.2014 at 17:09

Just in 25 mins. mauzer earn 2.5k SP on CW.

That game was 25 turns not 25 minutes. That means that with 4 minute turns he actually played for 100 minutes.

נכתב על ידי clovis1122, 01.12.2014 at 07:54

נכתב על ידי TheRiddler, 01.12.2014 at 07:53

That game was 25 turns not 25 minutes. That means that with 4 minute turns he actually played for 100 minutes.

Hello, I am from syndicate.

I played that cw and I can testify it was 1 minute CW.

Now you see why nobody except those who weren't present questioned why I say 25 mins? because they were witness of it. But yeah I guess there would be a lot more SP if the cw lasted more.

Oh, I see. Thanks for the explanation.