תשיג מנוי כדי להסתיר את כל מודעות הפרסום
הודעות: 7   בוקר על ידי: 38 users
02.11.2015 - 08:38
Dunno if this has been proposed. RA as a strategy was tank general in afterwind. This name is misnomer now since it isn't exactly a relentless attack.

My proposal for ra is to rename it is as tank general and make a new strategy as relentless atttack with following configurations :
tanks : -10 cost +1 range +1 attack -1 defense
Infantry same price +1 attack -1 defense -1hp
militia same price + 1 range -1 defense
bombers same price +1 attack -2 defense
marines same price +1attack -2 defense

Basically now you have a strategy with very strong attack capable of strong rushes but very weak defensively. You can use it take one player out but it leaves you very vulnerable in defense.

I think this is worth a try. Also do feel free to suggest your own configurations.
----
טוען...
טוען...
02.11.2015 - 10:57
Dont we like have enough Tank based strategies??

I would like to see a some more of stealth/naval type strategy, but thats my opinion lel. I don't even play though, still just a comment
----





נכתב על ידי Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015
טוען...
טוען...
02.11.2015 - 11:06
The strategy seems fairly reasonable (but very rushy and noob-attractive) but is it really needed? And why would we need a one unit strat when the community as a whole (well, most of it) has worked to remove that trend?
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


טוען...
טוען...
02.11.2015 - 12:34
נכתב על ידי Waffel, 02.11.2015 at 10:57

Dont we like have enough Tank based strategies??

I would like to see a some more of stealth/naval type strategy, but thats my opinion lel. I don't even play though, still just a comment

This isn't exactly tank based but rather attack oriented. you can maybe compare it to blitz a bit. tank genral has 1 dimensional play where you can only use tanks. with this you can use tanks infantry militia marines and even bombers to rush. its going to be little expensive though but best possible strat for rushing but weak defensively.
----
טוען...
טוען...
02.11.2015 - 12:36
נכתב על ידי The Tactician, 02.11.2015 at 11:06

The strategy seems fairly reasonable (but very rushy and noob-attractive) but is it really needed? And why would we need a one unit strat when the community as a whole (well, most of it) has worked to remove that trend?

this isn't 1 unit strat but 5 units with enhanced attack power for making strong rushes but is weak defensively. I agree about being rushy and noob attractive but its still worth a try.
----
טוען...
טוען...
02.11.2015 - 12:40
Tank General is an inappropriated name, considering the current RA boost bombers and destroyers...
טוען...
טוען...
02.11.2015 - 12:54
נכתב על ידי minusSeven, 02.11.2015 at 12:36

נכתב על ידי The Tactician, 02.11.2015 at 11:06

The strategy seems fairly reasonable (but very rushy and noob-attractive) but is it really needed? And why would we need a one unit strat when the community as a whole (well, most of it) has worked to remove that trend?

this isn't 1 unit strat but 5 units with enhanced attack power for making strong rushes but is weak defensively. I agree about being rushy and noob attractive but its still worth a try.

I meant making RA a one unit strat called tank general as you proposed. Your proposed strategy might be worth looking at to tweak RA though.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


טוען...
טוען...
atWar

About Us
Contact

פרטיות | תנאי שירות | באנרים | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

הצטרפו איתנו ב

הפץ את המילה