Ideas for changes in the Transports

Two main things suggestions,
One, that units stay transports once you put them in there and stay there until you move them. I don't like pressing the load button everytime I want to move them.Plus tanks in real life can't float in the ocean, While I haven't try it myself, I don't think they will float in the game
Two, Units attacking from transports suffer a attack plenty.It would make harder for people to just jump your capital early on, and don't think people in real would fight hundred percent after being unload from a ship or drop the air right on the battlefield.

The only problem with this is that the units aren't just jumping directly off of a transport, they're taking a week to do so. But I agree with the first idea.

Yes.

The only thing I think they need to change for transports is to take away the movement penalty for GW transports. I know I may be a little bias, but seriously...

Make a stealth transport that only carries marines for MoS?

נכתב על ידי Deray YG, 21.02.2012 at 07:42

Make a stealth transport that only carries marines for MoS?

submarines kind of do that already lol. I agree about the GW idea though, the transports are more expensive and less range? WTF >.<

No this idea is not good.

נכתב על ידי Wildchild92, 28.06.2012 at 03:54

נכתב על ידי Deray YG, 21.02.2012 at 07:42

Make a stealth transport that only carries marines for MoS?

submarines kind of do that already lol. I agree about the GW idea though, the transports are more expensive and less range? WTF >.<

Submarines handle sea transport but what about faster transportation through land? -_-

נכתב על ידי Wildchild92, 28.06.2012 at 03:54

נכתב על ידי Deray YG, 21.02.2012 at 07:42

Make a stealth transport that only carries marines for MoS?

submarines kind of do that already lol. I agree about the GW idea though, the transports are more expensive and less range? WTF >.<

Guerrilla Warfare is designed to be based on a sort of revolutionary army: a lot of militia and not many resources. The last I checked, I've never seen a militia build giant carriers that cost roughly 4.5 billion dollars and 400 million a year to run (estimating crew, fueling, and maintenance costs)

So the difficulty of acquiring resources for these floating behemoths, and the lack of knowledge to operate them, seems entirely to make sense.

Yes I know all too well what guerilla warefare is about and now a quote from another post that I mad to adress the issue of the transports costing more and haveing less range, I agree completely with your point now I present the whole point I was trying to make (in another post not this one).

נכתב על ידי Wildchild92, 21.06.2012 at 02:59

I say this could fix that confined feeling seeing as how air transports and transports cost more in this strategy and have less range, which I think they should only IF the marines get the +1 to range it would seem more....fitting to the name guerilla warefare seeing as how if it were actually guerilla fighters they wouldn't be burdened by logistical problems or the terrain as much as conventional forces thus they are more mobile. of course I understand this is a game just throwing my thoughts out there I hope you guys consider it.