הודעות חדשות

I will remake this map of ww1 in classical atwar Europe, any suggestions?

I tried making an icon for heli and a drone. Maybe Dave can use them if they're good enough.
Heli
Drone

Waddup world

I had the same thoughts as you DJ, and I tried to enforce the proper idea of elo on others but obviously it just never worked. There will always be campers, rushers, farmers, etc., its inherent to this game. People care too much about this number instead of the actual experience and skill it takes to beat people.

It sucks, but I agree with Witch Doctor when he says to just ignore elo. Just duel without thinking about the number. If you play with that mindset, you will be less frustrated (not to say you are, but I sure was until I stopped thinking about it).

Ignoring ELO is already practical, having "High ELO" lost all meaning long ago when players like TENGRI (no offense) could rush their way to 1700. The number is already meaningless, and skill level shouldn't be measured by it. Same with seasonal duel winners. I stopped dueling all together for that reason.

Its better to focus efforts on tournaments and clan wars, they are objectively much better measures of skills if you do well in them.

Yeah, see even new players love RP

RP Fags forever!!!

נכתב על ידי Lion Sin Escanor, 25.01.2021 at 21:43

נכתב על ידי Froyer, 25.01.2021 at 09:41

...

First thing mecoy isnt a weak player just because he likes to troll in duels vs other ppl and ends up with low elo and 2nd my win rate vs hineni is not 60% lol , I've pretty sure my win rate vs hineni is better then yours vs hineni last 100 days.

OUCH!

נכתב על ידי Froyer, 25.01.2021 at 09:41

Sorry but farming low elo isn't fun we are not all like lion sin retard, I can't have fun when i'm dueling mecoy so imagine if it's a 1300 elo.
High elo players don't need to play lower skilled player it won't make you stronger lol, you will get used to counter noob moves and will get raped by better players, just look at lion, he has a 60/50% winrate against mecoy and hineni when he has +150 elo, farming low elo noob doesn't make you stronger.

First thing mecoy isnt a weak player just because he likes to troll in duels vs other ppl and ends up with low elo and 2nd my win rate vs hineni is not 60% lol , I've pretty sure my win rate vs hineni is better then yours vs hineni last 100 days.

Yea sure. We are. Literally. Talking about people who are too stupid to figure out that their thoughts are exactly like those in 1936 Germany.

"Hey, I'm not saying I don't like black people or anything, I just don't want them in my city"

*internel thinking pattern*
"Oh, look at that black guy on the Internet, he must have a bigger dick than me. That means girls like him more."

"Hey, hey, heyyyy, wanna hear a joke? Gas the jews" Hehe, hehe, so funny"
(Other people reply with, yes. I agree)

Hmm... When people are on social media constantly and live around it. And need them replies so they can reply back it alters their thoughts and world views. Yes, I believe their is a point when social media sites need to be told off or take action... Talking about YouTube and Google too. They are also a huge part of this problem.

I used to like /pol/ on 4chan. But ever since 2014+ it's been taking literally...

"Hey hey hey hey! Wanna hear joke. I'm gonna live stream me killing Muslims while their praying because my mind, over time has been turned into a cluster fuck because I'm on social media all the time and even talking to others who also." joke" about how they dislike Muslims. Because ye know. "They will not replace us" "

You wouldn't say fuck you to a stranger in real life. So why do it online?
If you did do that irl for a long time.. What do you think would happen in your mind if you have no one else who understands you, but only online friends do...

Tbh... It's basic psychology.
Fake it till you make it, so much so you become delusional. Most of the people in the "Alt right" bla bla bla labels. Are young men in the ages of 14-late 20s who bring Internet jokes and speech into real life. Or, are Irl streamers or "Journalists" why do they do that? For a quick buck? Or their mind has slipped into an unfortunate phase that they possibly won't get out of.
Strange that all these types keep referring to "Take the red pill bro" even though when you ask them about the holocaust. They either don't think it's real or was smaller than initially thought. "What's your opinion on blacks" "Bro, they just low IQ because their skin."

69

What a bank should be is to have 3% city income increase every week along with less unit upkeep. Then people would buy a bank. Say New York is around 530 income at the start, and aw usually increase income over time unless bombarded into kingdom come. But with buying a bank. Income will increase faster. Say turn 20 nyc makes 1100 and that's without any attacks on it

You could just peace a player or ally them. If you don't want to have peace or alliance anymore you can always choose to end it with them . During that time you can't be attacked and can do what ever you desire during that time period.

End of discussion

Edit: in scenarios, map makers can only put implement teams. After turn 1 you can attack the other team. However you can't peace the opposing side. But in reality your objective in team games is to eliminate the opposing force.

There's no way around it unless it's PvP then TvT

Following the Capitol Insurrection, Apple and Google decided to cut ties with Parler as well as Amazon cut Parler's web services.

What do you think of this? Do you think it was justified for them to do this?

Console.WriteLine("Real competition");

צטט:

נכתב על ידי Froyer, 25.01.2021 at 16:04

Fixed

DAMMIT i shouldnt have said that

נכתב על ידי PleaseMe, 25.01.2021 at 15:59

Teach me Froyer, Mr. Best east player of all time

Fixed

Fuck you froyer, Mr. I only know Ukraine.

But I agree with you. I don't play low elo players because its BORING. Not because I am scared of losing precious elo.

I have played more duels than you have games on AtWar DJ. I think it's safe to say i've done my fair share of dueling. Let people do what they want. The system is fine.

נכתב על ידי Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 14:37

נכתב על ידי ITSGG1122, 22.01.2021 at 08:12

נכתב על ידי Andartes, 20.01.2021 at 11:44

נכתב על ידי International, 17.01.2021 at 07:09

One fascinating thing I noticed about any debate about "socialism" in the context of US politics is that this is a word that can be defined very narrowly or very expansively depending on whatever best suits the speaker's arguments.

When the motion of debate is "should we have socialism," self-described capitalists use the narrow definition of this word, to mean the distinct set of Soviet- or PRC-aligned communist dictatorships that existed in the Cold War, and of course we shouldn't have socialism, because of course we don't want famines, or political purges, or concentration camps, or what have you that characterise these historical communist dictatorships. From that perspective, why would anyone support socialism? What kind of monster would do that?

When the motion of debate switches to "what policies characterise socialism," however, anti-socialists suddenly do a 180-degree turn and define socialism extremely broadly, to mean basically any kind of intensive state intervention in the economy. Of course Western Europe is chock full of socialist states, and since we have already established that socialism is a thing that the United States shouldn't have, it follows that the United States should avoid implementing such radical socialist policies like universal healthcare that Europeans have.

And of course self-described communists do much the same thing, only the other way around.

So instead of trying to write a substantive argument on a foundation that won't support one, I will instead ask the original poster this. When you say that the United States should have "some communism", what, exactly, is meant by "some communism"? What policies does this entail and what social changes does it imply?

Without a clear and agreed-upon definition there can be no intellectually honest discussion.

What about Chinese Communism? One party state with market economy? Since oligarchs can hijack democracies, and votes doesn't matter anymore, we could simply copy Chinese politics: they are executing their corrupted individuals while supporting infrastructure, jobs, and citizen wellbeing.

You can't deny that market-based economies are the most efficient long-term and that authoritarianism is more efficient than democracy - where goals change every 4-5 years after elections, and authoritarian goals are there as long the regime exist.

Do you realize what made the great divergence happen? One of the main factors providing the way to the revolution is the absence of fucking absolutism.
It isnt just a coincidence that this revolution started in England out of all places. The great societies of Islam and China, while being advanced where overrided in less than a century.
Unless China becomes a free society and lets loose the authoritarian government it wont ever reach its full potential nor will it ever do what the free minds of the West did.

ok bud.. don't even go there. If China didn't have a strict government the country would be a god damn disaster. I DOUBT the country would stay in one piece, and it wouldn't the superpower that it is now. A nice example of your imaginary "perfect democracy china" would be hong kong, the place where riots devasted its economy. Even in homeland America, remember the BLM Protests and the Insurrection at the Capitol? I do too..

China is a very prosperous country at the moment, and its currently leading the world in trade and technology, very much on its way to being the Global Superpower, which even Americans are scared of. After all, the tariffs say a lot about it.

Explain to me how absolutism does not hold back innovation.
Explain why industrial revolution happened in England and not for example in glorieus china or glorieus islamic world.
Yes hong kong was close to being a democracy, if you had any knowledge of why they went protesting heavily, its because they are losing their democracy. Stop being so ignorant.
Demonstration and protest is good for a country to become better. Otherwise only a small elite will keep deciding what is good for a country.

The chinese started from rock bottom, for them the only way is up. And they wont be close to Western wealth size in nearly 50 years from now.
The chinese arent prosperous, they are just having surplusses of money because of their export growth etc. The chinese way was to copy the west and make profits out of it. Keep large western companies out of china. Google, FB, even keeping a limit to hollywood films.

When a country has 1.3 billion people and they will not experience large scale war then obviously they will accelerate and become richer. However their system lacks of becoming innovative. And that will always be a totalitarian problem.

Lets put it this way:
When the book print got invented and countries wanted to accelerate the production of it. What did the absolutist countries such as the Ottoman empire do. They banned book print, why? because this new technology will be a danger to their power control of the country.
The same thing applies to any country that has a totalitarian regime. When an innovative product comes as long, which threatens the elite power, they will ban it. Hence, there will be loss of economic opportunity because of it.

China isnt leading in trade nor technology. Nor is it close to being a superpower. It is getting closer by year, but as of 2021, they dont pose a threat yet to USA. The exact moment that changes, is the moment they will invade and annex Taiwan and USA wont do anything about it. I dont see that happening in the coming decades.

נכתב על ידי KhilafahSharia, 09.01.2021 at 06:13

This is fucking Orwellian. Trump supporters leave twitter after Trump's ban and flock around Parler. Guess what Google and Apple does?

Removes the app from their app stores xD. And people talk about free speech in America and how there's a free market competition. That's utter bullshit.

Guess what happens when Trump supporters can't vent their frustrations online- they vent them on the streets. I think that if Congress impeaches Trump next week, and it's likely that the swamp Republicans vote for it, then I expect there to be riots across America. The impeachment would ban Trump from running for office in 2024, effectively burning his future political career. Every Trump supporter sees the election fraud as a coup (from their perspective, not mine), and impeaching him will be seen as overthrowing the President.

They are so detached from the psychological reprecussions of their actions that it's ridiculous!

The US Is a dictatorship controlled by lobbyists and corrupt politicians, also social media influence this country to terrible heights.

Western imperialism at its finest

נכתב על ידי ITSGG1122, 22.01.2021 at 08:12

נכתב על ידי Andartes, 20.01.2021 at 11:44

נכתב על ידי International, 17.01.2021 at 07:09

One fascinating thing I noticed about any debate about "socialism" in the context of US politics is that this is a word that can be defined very narrowly or very expansively depending on whatever best suits the speaker's arguments.

When the motion of debate is "should we have socialism," self-described capitalists use the narrow definition of this word, to mean the distinct set of Soviet- or PRC-aligned communist dictatorships that existed in the Cold War, and of course we shouldn't have socialism, because of course we don't want famines, or political purges, or concentration camps, or what have you that characterise these historical communist dictatorships. From that perspective, why would anyone support socialism? What kind of monster would do that?

When the motion of debate switches to "what policies characterise socialism," however, anti-socialists suddenly do a 180-degree turn and define socialism extremely broadly, to mean basically any kind of intensive state intervention in the economy. Of course Western Europe is chock full of socialist states, and since we have already established that socialism is a thing that the United States shouldn't have, it follows that the United States should avoid implementing such radical socialist policies like universal healthcare that Europeans have.

And of course self-described communists do much the same thing, only the other way around.

So instead of trying to write a substantive argument on a foundation that won't support one, I will instead ask the original poster this. When you say that the United States should have "some communism", what, exactly, is meant by "some communism"? What policies does this entail and what social changes does it imply?

Without a clear and agreed-upon definition there can be no intellectually honest discussion.

What about Chinese Communism? One party state with market economy? Since oligarchs can hijack democracies, and votes doesn't matter anymore, we could simply copy Chinese politics: they are executing their corrupted individuals while supporting infrastructure, jobs, and citizen wellbeing.

You can't deny that market-based economies are the most efficient long-term and that authoritarianism is more efficient than democracy - where goals change every 4-5 years after elections, and authoritarian goals are there as long the regime exist.

Do you realize what made the great divergence happen? One of the main factors providing the way to the revolution is the absence of fucking absolutism.
It isnt just a coincidence that this revolution started in England out of all places. The great societies of Islam and China, while being advanced where overrided in less than a century.
Unless China becomes a free society and lets loose the authoritarian government it wont ever reach its full potential nor will it ever do what the free minds of the West did.

ok bud.. don't even go there. If China didn't have a strict government the country would be a god damn disaster. I DOUBT the country would stay in one piece, and it wouldn't the superpower that it is now. A nice example of your imaginary "perfect democracy china" would be hong kong, the place where riots devasted its economy. Even in homeland America, remember the BLM Protests and the Insurrection at the Capitol? I do too..

China is a very prosperous country at the moment, and its currently leading the world in trade and technology, very much on its way to being the Global Superpower, which even Americans are scared of. After all, the tariffs say a lot about it.

Watch for Panzer General VII coming soon to an atWar game near you.

נכתב על ידי WHlTE, 25.01.2021 at 12:58

Yes I should trust some screencap of an excel graph by someone who is too much of a coward to make his tweets public so I can look at his charts/data in more detail. I'm not disputing that bellweather counties were wrong, it's just highly suspicious when people make their tweets/profile private.

Oy vey its like anudah armenian genocide 6 gorrilion armenians die every day in Azerbaijan, that is why we must take 20% of Azeri territory, remember the armenian genocide goyyy we need to defeat this islamist in Azerbaijan.

נכתב על ידי T3mpest, 25.01.2021 at 09:45

נכתב על ידי Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 09:14

נכתב על ידי Khauman, 25.01.2021 at 09:06

נכתב על ידי Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 08:43

The censorship of trump is one thing, but google and amazon fucking decided to kill parler because its dominated by conservatives. thats basically an attack on free speech.

basically, be conservative = be censored

Also, incite violence = be censored

Why not censor Twitter then? Parler didn't encourage anyone to go to the capitol and riot.

Dumbass, Twitter only needs to censor Trump. Trump also encouraged his supporters to raid the capital. Also why you even talkin bout America, you ain't even from America.

I wasn't talking about trump, I was talking about Parler being removed. wut u going on about xD

This is how you learn, you have to get thrown in the deep end and you'll either swim or die. Sure, some people might die occasionally, but we get a stronger overall community

Thanks SwampNewts for open this game.

PS :The host of the game, will not produce any units during T1.

But movement during T1 is not prohibited, because it will not be possible to control every player joining the game.

It is broken OP in old aetius maps

נכתב על ידי Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 09:14

נכתב על ידי Khauman, 25.01.2021 at 09:06

נכתב על ידי Fatcheek, 25.01.2021 at 08:43

The censorship of trump is one thing, but google and amazon fucking decided to kill parler because its dominated by conservatives. thats basically an attack on free speech.

basically, be conservative = be censored

Also, incite violence = be censored

Why not censor Twitter then? Parler didn't encourage anyone to go to the capitol and riot.

Dumbass, Twitter only needs to censor Trump. Trump also encouraged his supporters to raid the capital. Also why you even talkin bout America, you ain't even from America.

Sorry but farming low elo isn't fun we are not all like lion sin retard, I can't have fun when i'm dueling mecoy so imagine if it's a 1300 elo.
High elo players don't need to play lower skilled player it won't make you stronger lol, you will get used to counter noob moves and will get raped by better players, just look at lion, he has a 60/50% winrate against mecoy and hineni when he has +150 elo, farming low elo noob doesn't make you stronger.